1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
notallfeminists-deactivated2015
notallfeminists:

shittywebcomics:

thefapcontroller:

shittywebcomics:


Welp.
It was fun while it lasted.

MOD 1:  He could be just giving some empty lip service to placate the hysterical feminists.  “Look I’m on your side, I agree with you, now you can ignore me while we go back to doing what we’ve been doing anyway.”
Saints Row is one of premiere game series that lets you play as a woman all the way through.  So they have nothing that needs changing.  They’ve had several good female characters already.
This is part of a game company’s job now, is to mouth platitudes about “important social issues” and say “our game company is going to address these things!”  And then they simply don’t have to, all anyone cares about in society is people saying “we’ll do something!” and then standing around and continuing business as usual.

I just saw it as Jaros saying that Anita has at least one valid point - that women are underrepresented in games, and that he intends to help curb that. Volition has done a fantastic job of it in the past, however.I don’t think he’s advocating her, just saying that the core reason for her presence is something that should be addressed.Also, developers saying she’s full of shit publically would be a PR disaster. If anyone’s going to mention her, this is about as negative or dismissive as they’ll get. I think Jaros handled the question well.

he’s still wrong, women aren’t underrepresented in games. there is a higher ratio of video games with female characters than there are actual female video game PLAYERS.
the core reason anita sarkeesian has for existing in the gaming community is because she falsely accuses gamers and the gaming industry of sexism, and when criticized complains that she’s being harassed and threatened. so no, she serves no purpose in the gaming community except to continue what the female gender has always done to make gamers: demonize them for playing video games instead of spending their money trying to date women.
unfortunately, the developers themselves will have to stay quiet, because misandry is currently the safest stance to take while anything critical of female misbehavior is instantly labeled as sexist misogynist patriarchal rape culture and equates to career suicide. basically, how a tyrannical dictatorship operates in order to subjugate it’s citizens.

“The core reason Anita Sarkeesian has for existing in the gaming community is because she falsely accuses gamers and the gaming industry of sexism, and when criticized complains that she’s being harassed and threatened.”
Exactly. Could not have said it any better.

notallfeminists:

shittywebcomics:

thefapcontroller:

shittywebcomics:

Welp.

It was fun while it lasted.

MOD 1:  He could be just giving some empty lip service to placate the hysterical feminists.  “Look I’m on your side, I agree with you, now you can ignore me while we go back to doing what we’ve been doing anyway.”

Saints Row is one of premiere game series that lets you play as a woman all the way through.  So they have nothing that needs changing.  They’ve had several good female characters already.

This is part of a game company’s job now, is to mouth platitudes about “important social issues” and say “our game company is going to address these things!”  And then they simply don’t have to, all anyone cares about in society is people saying “we’ll do something!” and then standing around and continuing business as usual.

I just saw it as Jaros saying that Anita has at least one valid point - that women are underrepresented in games, and that he intends to help curb that. Volition has done a fantastic job of it in the past, however.

I don’t think he’s advocating her, just saying that the core reason for her presence is something that should be addressed.

Also, developers saying she’s full of shit publically would be a PR disaster. If anyone’s going to mention her, this is about as negative or dismissive as they’ll get. I think Jaros handled the question well.

he’s still wrong, women aren’t underrepresented in games. there is a higher ratio of video games with female characters than there are actual female video game PLAYERS.

the core reason anita sarkeesian has for existing in the gaming community is because she falsely accuses gamers and the gaming industry of sexism, and when criticized complains that she’s being harassed and threatened. so no, she serves no purpose in the gaming community except to continue what the female gender has always done to make gamers: demonize them for playing video games instead of spending their money trying to date women.

unfortunately, the developers themselves will have to stay quiet, because misandry is currently the safest stance to take while anything critical of female misbehavior is instantly labeled as sexist misogynist patriarchal rape culture and equates to career suicide. basically, how a tyrannical dictatorship operates in order to subjugate it’s citizens.

“The core reason Anita Sarkeesian has for existing in the gaming community is because she falsely accuses gamers and the gaming industry of sexism, and when criticized complains that she’s being harassed and threatened.”

Exactly. Could not have said it any better.

notallfeminists-deactivated2015